File image courtesy: Cpl. Tyler HillAs politicians in Washington declare the war in Iraq officially over, the vast majority of Americans, regardless of their political stance on the eight and a half year conflict, feel a deep sense of gratitude for the hundreds of thousands of men and women who fought there. We live in a noble, patriotic nation that knows how to thank those who volunteer to defend America.
The New York Times, on the other hand, is treating this historic day as an occasion to smear our military. From the current front page of its website, which has a sub-headline of "An Unpopular Conflict Comes to an Uncertain End," to the print version's
incendiary, inaccurate Dec. 15 front page story, the Times has made clear that it will continue to attack our troops in the name of "journalism."
After
TIME published a
Mar. 19, 2006 story about what it called a "massacre" in Haditha, Iraq, on Nov. 19, 2005, the mainstream media, especially the New York Times, heavily pushed the story on its front and editorial pages. Almost universally, journalists treated the allegations as fact, placing the burden on U.S. Marines to prove their innocence after the deaths of 24 civilians in a combat zone.
Despicable columns
like this one by the New York Times' Maureen Dowd perfectly sum up the newspaper's condemnation of Marines risking their lives in Iraq's then-volatile Al Anbar province.
"It's a My Lai acid flashback," she wrote on May 27, 2006. "The force that sacked Saddam to stop him from killing innocents is now accused of killing innocents. Under pressure from the president to restore law, but making little progress, marines from Camp Pendleton, many deployed in Iraq for the third time, reportedly resorted to lawlessness themselves."
More than six years after the battle, with seven U.S. Marines exonerated of murdering civilians and one still awaiting trial, the Times decided the day of the war in Iraq's official conclusion was a perfect time for a Haditha acid flashback. I don't use that term to dignify the hate-filled language Dowd used during a time of war, but to express my complete dismay at the Times' shameful attempt to throw battery acid on the honor of our brave troops coming home to their families after leaving Iraq's future in the hands of Iraqis. In the view of most Americans, today should mark a unifying moment.
File image courtesy: Senior Airman Chad TrujilloIn Thursday's Times story, "Junkyard Gives Up Secret Accounts of Massacre in Iraq," reporter Michael S. Schmidt trumpets his finding of about 400 pages of classified documents in a Baghdad junkyard. Schmidt proclaims that he's found the smoking gun, finally proving that Marines murdered innocent Iraqi civilians in cold blood.
"The documents — many marked secret — form part of the military’s internal investigation, and confirm much of what happened at Haditha, a Euphrates River town where Marines killed 24 Iraqis, including a 76-year-old man in a wheelchair, women and children, some just toddlers," Schmidt wrote.
The problem is that his story, which quotes repeatedly from the documents, absolutely does not prove that any U.S. Marines committed murder on Nov. 19, 2005. Instead of relying on facts, Schmidt relies on a provocative headline and loaded terms like "massacre" to make his newspaper's case against U.S. troops.
Instead of proving that Marines are murderers, the article actually proves what one Marine combat veteran who served in Al Anbar province told me this morning; that Marines under fire were repeatedly forced to make extraordinarily difficult, split-second decisions to complete their missions and preserve their lives. Not only would our enemies use civilians as human shields and leave their bodies in the streets for U.S. Marines to clean up, terrorists would specifically target Iraqi children and use the media to blame their deaths on Americans.
To put it mildly, Schmidt has a different viewpoint.
"Haditha became a defining moment of the war, helping cement an enduring Iraqi distrust of the United States and a resentment that not one Marine has been convicted," the New York Times reporter opines.
Haditha became a defining moment of the war because national media outlets repeatedly put the story on front pages and at the top of newscasts, convicting several Marines who were later exonerated. I spoke out against this trend while working at
CNN, which subsequently failed to report on the exoneration of accused Marines with the same vigor it used to trumpet the allegations.
"In their own words, the report documents the dehumanizing nature of this war, where Marines came to view 20 dead civilians as not 'remarkable,' but as routine," Schmidt writes.
This war? Every war is dehumanizing, and civilians are unfortunately killed in every armed conflict. During World War II, which both my grandfathers served in, American troops killed thousands of civilians during hellish, confusing battles. If the national media treated the heroes who fought World War II like those who volunteered to fight the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, the Greatest Generation might be seen in a different light, despite the fact that they made impossible choices on the battlefield for the greater good of defeating forces of evil and ultimately ending the bloodiest conflict in human history.
The Times reporter, however, reflexively calls the deaths of 24 civilians a "massacre by Marines of Iraqi civilians in the town of Haditha." Schmidt makes this claim despite the absence of proof that these civilian deaths were calculated acts of murder, which courts have reaffirmed in seven cases. He portrays Marines as confused and hostile toward Iraqis, when in fact Marines like
1st Lt. Travis Manion, who
died in Al Anbar province on Apr. 29, 2007, dedicated the last months of their lives to training Iraqi forces and protecting civilians.
Shamefully, Schmidt's attack piece fails to mention the name of
Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas, 20, of El Paso, Texas. Lance Cpl. Terrazas, who was known as "T.J." to many of his buddies, was killed by the roadside bomb planted by terrorists on Nov. 19, 2005, which ignited the chaotic battle in Haditha that followed. To write a front-page story smearing Terrazas' fellow Marines, without even having the decency to mention his name, is a perfect example of why almost every active duty service member, combat veteran, and military family member I speak with holds hostility toward this once-proud newspaper.
I have never been to Haditha, but on a day that politicians are calling the last in our country's second war in Iraq, I am proud of the men and women who fought there. As an American citizen, I am also proud that Haditha's streets now bustle with commerce, as pictured below, and that despite complex political and strategic realities, Iraq now has a chance to be a free country.
On Dec. 15, 2011, the military is one of America's most revered institutions. Journalism, which continues a sad, rapid decline to the dungeon of mistrust, is one of our nation's least respected professions. If you want to know why, all you have to do is read the front page of today's New York Times.
Image courtesy: Staff Sgt. Chad Simon